Ceramic Ware of Ivan Levynskyi’s Company: Types and Ornamentation

  • 29.08.2024
  • 159 Переглядів

Clay ceramics are a unique source of historical, ethnographic, cultural, and socio-economic information. Household items vividly demonstrate the connection between daily life and economic conditions. Through the form, ornaments, and production techniques of ceramic items, one can trace cultural influences, knowledge exchange, and the development of craft traditions.

The ceramic ware of Ivan Levynskyi’s company can be divided into the following typological groups:

  • For cooking dishes and beverages — kitchenware;
  • For collecting, storing, and transporting products and beverages;
  • For serving and consuming dishes and beverages, i.e., tableware;
  • For performing rituals, festive ware, i.e., made or purchased specifically for carrying out or preparing for a ritual.

The products of Ivan Levynskyi’s factory abound in decorative elements, as it is known that the renowned Lviv architect was a great admirer of majolica. In addition to their utilitarian purpose, these items also served an important decorative function. Richly decorated tableware was typically used for festive feasts such as Christmas Eve, Easter dinner, weddings, and Sunday family meals, as well as for interior decoration.

When Ivan Levynskyi began his activity in ceramic production in the late 1880s, ornamentation played a significant role in the culture of Galicia. Household items were generously decorated with traditional folk patterns and motifs from various historical styles that were popular in the art industry of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The Art Nouveau style, which emerged at the turn of the century, encouraged artists to search for new motifs and forms, emphasizing their ability to abstract and stylize natural forms and harmoniously combine decoration with construction. Instead of copying classical architectural decorations from plaster casts, which was common in art-industrial schools, Art Nouveau turned to the study of natural forms of local flora and fauna, based on which unique patterns were created. Design elements became more dynamic: the axis of symmetry transformed into twisted spirals stretching diagonally across the form, and the uneven rhythm intertwined curved lines.

Masters experimented with various stylizations, using images of lilies, dandelions, thistles, and wildflowers like cornflowers and daisies. Sometimes they drew inspiration from Eastern art, choosing either Japanese aesthetics with the free arrangement of blooming branches on a white background or Iranian-Turkish motifs with rich colors and details. However, from the very beginning, the pottery and tableware department of I. Levynskyi’s company was oriented toward assimilating elements and principles of national ornamentation.

Instead of depicting ancient heroes on the forms of Greek amphorae, craftsmen depicted scenes of national life, such as “The Hutsuls’ March,” replacing classical elements like ionic volutes and anthemia with “Bahmatyuk bells” and Turkish carnations, as seen on the vase from 1899 by the master with the monogram “S. D.” The popularity of native art grew thanks to the educational activities of the Ukrainian intelligentsia, and the craftsmen of Levynskyi’s factory continued to perfect ornaments in the “Ukrainian style.” Ivan Levynskyi actively involved both ceramists (Emil Dubrava, Osyp and Mykola Biloskursky, Mykhailo Halibey, Mykhailo Lukiianovych, Yuriy Lebishchak, and others) and architects (Oleksandr Lushpynskyi, Lev Levynskyi, Hnat Koltsunyk) in this process.

In the ornaments of the pottery of I. Levynskyi’s factory from the first decade of the 20th century, one can find not only elements of decor from folk ceramics but also motifs from Hutsul woodcarving, renowned for the works of the Shkrybliak dynasty, fragments of folk embroidery rich in geometric variations, and motifs from Hutsul brass work.

The decor of ceramics from Ivan Levynskyi’s factory absorbed numerous elements of folk art, national worldview, and ethnogenesis, preserving them in exquisite forms left to descendants as fundamental material for further creative development.

Sources: Ceramic code of Ivan Levinsky in the aesthetic dimension of the Ukrainian of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. / edited by A. Klimashevskyi. Lviv: Institute of Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Kharkiv: Rarities of Ukraine, 2020. 256 p.; fig. (Series “From the Chest of Time”)